Author: James George Frazer
Translator: Gyeong-deok Lee
|Important! Please read before you order!|
|>>>This book is written in Korean only.|
About This Book
The Golden Bough: A Study in Magic and Religion is a broad comparative
cultural study of mythology and religion by Scottish anthropologist Sir
James George Frazer (1854-1941). Aimed at a broad literate audience
raised on tales as told in Bulfinch's Age of Fable, Frazer's book joined
the modernists in discussing religion dispassionately as a cultural
phenomenon, rather than from within the field of theology itself. Though
the final worth of its contribution to anthropology will be newly summed
by each generation, its impact on contemporary European literature was
This seminal book attempts to define what almost all primitive religions share with each other?and with "modern" religions such as Christianity. Its thesis is that ancient religions were fertility cults that centred around the worship of, and periodic sacrifice of, a sacred king, the incarnation of a dying and reviving god, a solar deity who underwent a mystic marriage to a goddess of the earth, and who died at the harvest and who was reincarnated in the spring. It claimed that this legend was central to almost all of the world's mythologies. It was the scandal of the book from the first date of sale to the innocent public that Frazer included the Christian story of Jesus in his book, thus inviting an agnostic lese majeste against the Lamb of God. Frazer removed his analysis of the Crucifixion to a speculative appendix for the third edition, and it was entirely missing from the single-volume abridged edition.
"If the test of truth lay in a show of hands or a counting of heads, the system of magic might appeal, with far more reason than the Catholic Church, to the proud motto, Quod semper, quod ubique, quod ab omnibus ["Always, everywhere, and by all" - ed.], as the sure and certain credential of its own infallibility." (Chapter 4, "Magic and Religion".)
Parts of the book, most notably its discussion of the symbolism of magic, and its elucidation of the concept of sympathetic magic, remain well accepted by scholars today. The larger thesis about dying and reviving gods has not fared as well in the world of anthropology and comparative religion; most contemporary anthropologists have concluded that Frazer overinterpreted his evidence to fit it into the system.
Frazer often reveals a confidence in a linear intellectual progress of mankind to a superior position which anthropologists no longer share. As cultural anthropology has expanded and deepened, many individual conclusions of Frazer's have required revision within local and historical cultural contexts. Modern anthropoligists conclude that Frazer placed too much weight on what he called "the essential similarity of man's chief wants everywhere and at all times" (ch. lxix).
William Butler Yeats, James Joyce, D. H. Lawrence, T. S. Eliot, Robert Graves, Ezra Pound, Mary Renault and Joseph Campbell are but a few authors deeply influenced by The Golden Bough. Its literary impact has given it continued life even as its direct influence in anthropology has waned.
The title was taken from an incident in the Aeneid, illustrated in this painting The Golden Bough by the British artist Joseph Mallord William Turner (1775-1851): Aeneas and the Sibyl present the golden bough to the gatekeeper of Hades to gain admission.
This is a Korean translation of the abridged edition Mary Douglas with 170 illustration that enormously helps better understand this truly captivating discussion.
Availability: Usually ships in 5~10 business days.